Revolution is the response of people who are desperate for change, who believe that no price is too high for a radical shift in the current situation.
What, personally or politically, would make you feel that only revolution would be an adequate response?
I am perceiving from the illustration and the use of the word REVOLUTION in the discussion that the use of violence is to be used. Of course that is my own observation. There are other ways that a revolution can be mounted. As we know, MLK jr and M Gandhi “revolutionized” the definition for many by introducing the concept of non violence protest. Interesting , at this point, both methods are being used: protest marches and rallies etc. as well as terrorist killing tactics against enemies as well as innocents. When there is a need to revolt, the first is preferable, in my opinion.